From the Bleacher Report, scouting Logan Thomas: “…It’s easy to hate on Logan Thomas after his struggles the past two seasons at Virginia Tech. He struggled with his ball placement, his footwork hadn’t substantially improved, and his overall confidence seemed to fade over the past two years.
“But when teams draft quarterbacks after the first round, they’re looking for passers with the upside to develop into potential starters. Thomas has plenty of negatives on his scouting report, but his 6’6” size, ideal body type, strong arm and flashes on film that remind one of Cam Newton should be enough to intrigue teams in the first two rounds. Thomas has been the forgotten man in the media after a lackluster Senior Bowl.“
We see this report far too often and many NFL franchises have followed this blue-print; Ignore the negative intangibles while allowing their eyes to salivate over the qualities that really mean very little, if any, to the success or potential failure of a draft prospect. Man still believes bigger is better, despite the nano-technology that makes life easier.
So what are the critical skills needed that provide a prospect the best chance to succeed? The qualities I scout are:
- Rises to the occasion.
- Handles pressure easily.
- A leader.
- Handles the blitz extremely well.
- Accuracy versus the blitz.
- Pocket presence.
- Extends plays.
- Deep ball accuracy.
- Short pass accuracy.
- Good Passer [timing, touch-pass, quick delivery, over-all accuracy].
The first thing I look for is, how does that quarterback perform when the game is on the line? Should he stumble and falter I just move onto the next quarterback. The quarterback I look for must always rise to the occasion, playing bigger than the moment. My next question is how does he handle the pressure. He must handle the pressure like a master teaching a student. He must be a leader.
Does he do the little things right? That requires intelligence and an agile mind. Does he check down? Does he lead the defense? Does he smartly throw the ball away? How often has he over-looked his open receiver? Is he quick to find his passing lanes? Does he take too many risks into tight windows? How many interceptions were his fault versus the receiver?
How is his ability to move the pocket? Stand in the pocket? Does he make his receivers better or do they make him better? That question can only be answered by his receivers; Do they adjust often to the pass? Do they often come back to the ball?, etc..If yes to any, then the receivers make him better.
Johnny Manziel possess all of these traits and skills. I have tried to find reasons to not like Johnny “Football”, but the more negatives I try to find the more I like him. If Manziel were several inches taller, I’m confident he’d have more fans demanding their team take a chance.
The two generic reasons why so many fans are in distaste of this kid, is his height and pocket presence. His height is something that can not be fixed, nor does that guarantee his failure. His perceived lack of pocket presence is a lazy excuse at best for ridiculing him, because that just isn’t true. [click here for pocket passing video].
Many fans would love to have seen Nick Saban gracing the sidelines, however, many down-play his praises for Manziel – a quarterback Saban had two face more than he would have liked, calling Manziel one of the greatest competitors in his 40 years of coaching.
The USAToday said: “But at No. 1-ranked Alabama, which has the most legitimate reason of all to dislike Manziel, the praise this week has been so effusive, it almost seems orchestrated. ‘He deserves the hype he’s gotten because of what he’s done and how he’s played,” safety HaHa Clinton-Dix said. “It doesn’t bother me at all. He’s one of a kind, if you ask me’.”
“We just weren’t used to a player like Johnny Manziel,” safety Vinnie Sunseri said. “We know what he’s capable of doing now.”
The Alabama football paper said this: “Prior to this game, Nick Saban said that preparing for Johnny Manziel was extremely difficult because he does so many things “off schedule”. This means that Johnny Football basically ad libs most of the time and he can use his legs as well as his arm to suck the life right out of your defense. Nick Saban and Kirby Smart devised a game plan that was intent on making Manziel stay in the pocket and prove he has the ability to be a pocket passer. Well, guess what? He damn sure proved it by hitting on 28 of his 39 passes, most of which emanated from the pocket.“
“Meanwhile, the Bama defense blitzed. They played zone. They played zone and man. They played bump and run (mostly whiff and run). They changed their front from a 4-2 to a 4-1 and then to a 3-2 and a 3-1. They did everything they could possibly do to Johnny Football but, in the end, nothing worked. And, in the rare instance that Alabama actually got some pressure on Manziel, he simply lofted up a pass to 6’5 Mike Evans and suddenly things got much better for the Aggies. In the pocket, Manziel was a nightmare but down the field the Tide had no answers for Evans, either. Between the two of them, Alabama nearly suffered an agonizing defeat. But, as it is, the Tide survived the A&M onslaught and they can be thankful that they won’t see the likes of Johnny Football ever again. Whew.”
Apache Warrior legend Geronimo was said he never had to tell his story, his enemies wrote his story for him.
I can’t say Johnny Manziel will be an NFL legend, but he has made his name known among his foes while earning their respect, There are no accurate barometers to indicate he will not perform at the next level and one’s opinion simply doesn’t influence the outcome.
There is no need to cite the scouting reports, that wasn’t my objective with my own scouting report…I simply wanted to touch on the grey areas surrounding Manziel and answer his critics.
Love him, hate him – there’s no denying Manziel is special. How much, well, that remains to be seen., but I doubt he will disappoint his fans.
The federal government claimed Cliven Bundy’s cattle was a threat to the desert tortoise, after the federal government destroyed about 700 desert tortoises on their own, while re-locating others.
Many left-wingers claimed, as did the left-leaning media, that Bundy refused to pay the grazing fees owed…but we know that isn’t true either.
Maybe the federal and state government wanted the land to develop a waterway system after local and state Nevada government failed to adequately provide a waterway system in the area where the Bundy Ranch was located.
Maybe the government wanted the land for future oil and gas leases…fracking.
Click here for more outside links.
Maybe the fifteen year government silence over the “alleged” failed fee payment by Cliven Bundy was stirred by Harry Reid himself
While it strongly appears to the outside world this was government testing the will of Americans, I do think government got a wake-up call that Americans will no longer be pushed around. I don’t believe Harry Reid & friends expected to see the resistance they faced as they tried their land-grabbing tyrannical intent, and it may have shocked the powers-that-be and would explain their sudden withdrawal.
Moving forward, I do believe we may see more Executive Orders, and very different tactics used by government to impose their will.
Date: Saturday, 12 April 2014
Time: 1840 ET
To: Steve Quayle
From Doug Hagmann
At 1750 hours ET, I was contacted by my source within the Department of Homeland Security regarding the current situation at the Bundy Ranch. To put it bluntly, the people are being hoodwinked into believing that the situation is being resolved. It is not. It is a strategic de-escalation to fool the public. This sourcestated that the retreat of the BLM agents and the release of the cattle was actually crafted as a potential plan yesterday (Friday, 11 April 2014) based on the following:
1. A military assessment of satellite and drone surveillance imagery of the “patriot resistance. Drones under the control of the U.S. military were in use, taking real-time photographic images of not just the activity at the ranch, but “identifying the protesters, any arms and any supplies they might have or be carrying. “Mission accomplished.”
2. Real-time communication intercepts between patriots on-site and their off-site support;
3. Active monitoring of internet traffic regarding the coverage of events at ranch;
4. The monitoring of real-time video from the scene.
This source stated that a response by the patriot movement was anticipated, although exceeded their expectations. Although this was a real operation, they also ran this as a test case for future government operations once they saw the response. They were also actively managing the media, in some cases threatening to cut off White House access to anyone covering the event.
Despite this, the coverage by the alternative media began to create a public relations problem that was not easily managed. Note the lack of acknowledgment by the White House regarding this event. They are intentionally framing it as a state issue, despite the fact that all federal response has been and continues to be from the White House. There is a reason for this – a reason that has not been identified in any of the public reports to date. I will explain in further detail in a follow-up report on Sunday, after this source attends [redacted] to obtain more specific information about future federal operations. Regardless, according to this source, the government will take back ‘their land’ as they must to fulfill international obligations. It was never about grazing rights or anything other than (1) “securing clear title” to the land, and (2) further demonizing any patriotic resistance. It is my understanding, based on the information from this source, that it is a critical task to create a situation that will also advance their agenda of gun control and confiscation.
A more detailed report will follow on Sunday, 13 April 2014, with additional and much more specific information about their inside plans and future operations.
PLEASE MAKE THIS VIRAL!
The warning on any toothpaste reads: If you accidentally swallow more than used for brushing, get medical help or contact a Poison Control Center right away.
The warning on fluoride rinse says the same: If more than used for rinsing is accidentally swallowed, get medical help or contact a Poison Control Center right away.
Yet, our government, the Center of Disease and Control, as well as many health officials tell the public “fluoride in water is good for you!”
Cyanide and arsenic is the same as fluoride. In small amounts, it has no immediate effects on the human body. The damage happens when enough has been compounded, and ill-effects become apparent, until death occurs.
Drinking water contains Sodium fluoride, Fluorosilicic acid and Sodium fluorosilicic. [I have hyperlinked MSDS sheets]. Sodium fluoride is the same active ingredient contained in toothpaste and mouth rinse. The same ingredient that comes with the warnings to seek immediate medical help or a Poison Control Center.
I’m no chemist, but common-sense tells me to beware.
The goal of water fluoridation is to prevent a chronic disease whose burdens particularly fall on children and the poor. Its use presents a conflict between the common good and individual rights. Health and dental organizations worldwide have endorsed its safety and effectiveness. Its use began in 1945, following studies of children in a region where higher levels of fluoride occur naturally in the water. Researchers discovered that moderate fluoridation prevents tooth decay, and as of 2004 about 400 million people worldwide received fluoridated water.
Fluoride’s effects depend on the total daily intake of fluoride from all sources. About 70–90% of ingested fluoride is absorbed into the blood, where it distributes throughout the body.
The oft over-looked role in the human consumption of tap water is Hydrogen Fluoride. Hydrogen fluoride is used in the glass etching, electronic, and chemical industries. Hydrogen fluoride is predominantly used in the production of aluminum and chlorofluorocarbons. It is also used for separating uranium isotopes, as a catalyst in the petroleum industry, and in stainless steel pickling.
Chronic exposure to fluoride through drinking water has been observed to cause dental fluorosis or mottling (staining or pitting of teeth) in humans. At higher intakes through oral or inhalation exposure, skeletal fluorosis (i.e., an accumulation of fluoride in the skeletal tissues associated with pathological bone formation) has been noted in humans.
At high concentrations, chronic oral fluoride exposure has been reported to result in adverse pulmonary effects, renal injury, thyroid injury, anemia, hypersensitivity, and dermatological reactions in humans. Fluoride has been observed to cross the placenta in humans.
Oddly, the EPA has not established a Reference Concentration or a Reference Dose for hydrogen fluoride. Nor has the EPA classified hydrogen fluoride with respect to potential carcinogenicity. Also, those in favor of the fluoridation of drinking water say that effects of not putting fluoride in drinking water causes the effects that over-exposure to fluoride causes.
Fluoride, even in small quantities, are accumulated in the human body, the same fluoride that toothpaste and oral mouth wash manufacturers provide a warning to seek immediate medical attention should a larger than normal usage be accidentally ingested.