The federal government claimed Cliven Bundy’s cattle was a threat to the desert tortoise, after the federal government destroyed about 700 desert tortoises on their own, while re-locating others.
Many left-wingers claimed, as did the left-leaning media, that Bundy refused to pay the grazing fees owed…but we know that isn’t true either.
Maybe the federal and state government wanted the land to develop a waterway system after local and state Nevada government failed to adequately provide a waterway system in the area where the Bundy Ranch was located.
Maybe the government wanted the land for future oil and gas leases…fracking.
Click here for more outside links.
Maybe the fifteen year government silence over the “alleged” failed fee payment by Cliven Bundy was stirred by Harry Reid himself
While it strongly appears to the outside world this was government testing the will of Americans, I do think government got a wake-up call that Americans will no longer be pushed around. I don’t believe Harry Reid & friends expected to see the resistance they faced as they tried their land-grabbing tyrannical intent, and it may have shocked the powers-that-be and would explain their sudden withdrawal.
Moving forward, I do believe we may see more Executive Orders, and very different tactics used by government to impose their will.
Date: Saturday, 12 April 2014
Time: 1840 ET
To: Steve Quayle
From Doug Hagmann
At 1750 hours ET, I was contacted by my source within the Department of Homeland Security regarding the current situation at the Bundy Ranch. To put it bluntly, the people are being hoodwinked into believing that the situation is being resolved. It is not. It is a strategic de-escalation to fool the public. This sourcestated that the retreat of the BLM agents and the release of the cattle was actually crafted as a potential plan yesterday (Friday, 11 April 2014) based on the following:
1. A military assessment of satellite and drone surveillance imagery of the “patriot resistance. Drones under the control of the U.S. military were in use, taking real-time photographic images of not just the activity at the ranch, but “identifying the protesters, any arms and any supplies they might have or be carrying. “Mission accomplished.”
2. Real-time communication intercepts between patriots on-site and their off-site support;
3. Active monitoring of internet traffic regarding the coverage of events at ranch;
4. The monitoring of real-time video from the scene.
This source stated that a response by the patriot movement was anticipated, although exceeded their expectations. Although this was a real operation, they also ran this as a test case for future government operations once they saw the response. They were also actively managing the media, in some cases threatening to cut off White House access to anyone covering the event.
Despite this, the coverage by the alternative media began to create a public relations problem that was not easily managed. Note the lack of acknowledgment by the White House regarding this event. They are intentionally framing it as a state issue, despite the fact that all federal response has been and continues to be from the White House. There is a reason for this – a reason that has not been identified in any of the public reports to date. I will explain in further detail in a follow-up report on Sunday, after this source attends [redacted] to obtain more specific information about future federal operations. Regardless, according to this source, the government will take back ‘their land’ as they must to fulfill international obligations. It was never about grazing rights or anything other than (1) “securing clear title” to the land, and (2) further demonizing any patriotic resistance. It is my understanding, based on the information from this source, that it is a critical task to create a situation that will also advance their agenda of gun control and confiscation.
A more detailed report will follow on Sunday, 13 April 2014, with additional and much more specific information about their inside plans and future operations.
PLEASE MAKE THIS VIRAL!
The warning on any toothpaste reads: If you accidentally swallow more than used for brushing, get medical help or contact a Poison Control Center right away.
The warning on fluoride rinse says the same: If more than used for rinsing is accidentally swallowed, get medical help or contact a Poison Control Center right away.
Yet, our government, the Center of Disease and Control, as well as many health officials tell the public “fluoride in water is good for you!”
Cyanide and arsenic is the same as fluoride. In small amounts, it has no immediate effects on the human body. The damage happens when enough has been compounded, and ill-effects become apparent, until death occurs.
Drinking water contains Sodium fluoride, Fluorosilicic acid and Sodium fluorosilicic. [I have hyperlinked MSDS sheets]. Sodium fluoride is the same active ingredient contained in toothpaste and mouth rinse. The same ingredient that comes with the warnings to seek immediate medical help or a Poison Control Center.
I’m no chemist, but common-sense tells me to beware.
The goal of water fluoridation is to prevent a chronic disease whose burdens particularly fall on children and the poor. Its use presents a conflict between the common good and individual rights. Health and dental organizations worldwide have endorsed its safety and effectiveness. Its use began in 1945, following studies of children in a region where higher levels of fluoride occur naturally in the water. Researchers discovered that moderate fluoridation prevents tooth decay, and as of 2004 about 400 million people worldwide received fluoridated water.
Fluoride’s effects depend on the total daily intake of fluoride from all sources. About 70–90% of ingested fluoride is absorbed into the blood, where it distributes throughout the body.
The oft over-looked role in the human consumption of tap water is Hydrogen Fluoride. Hydrogen fluoride is used in the glass etching, electronic, and chemical industries. Hydrogen fluoride is predominantly used in the production of aluminum and chlorofluorocarbons. It is also used for separating uranium isotopes, as a catalyst in the petroleum industry, and in stainless steel pickling.
Chronic exposure to fluoride through drinking water has been observed to cause dental fluorosis or mottling (staining or pitting of teeth) in humans. At higher intakes through oral or inhalation exposure, skeletal fluorosis (i.e., an accumulation of fluoride in the skeletal tissues associated with pathological bone formation) has been noted in humans.
At high concentrations, chronic oral fluoride exposure has been reported to result in adverse pulmonary effects, renal injury, thyroid injury, anemia, hypersensitivity, and dermatological reactions in humans. Fluoride has been observed to cross the placenta in humans.
Oddly, the EPA has not established a Reference Concentration or a Reference Dose for hydrogen fluoride. Nor has the EPA classified hydrogen fluoride with respect to potential carcinogenicity. Also, those in favor of the fluoridation of drinking water say that effects of not putting fluoride in drinking water causes the effects that over-exposure to fluoride causes.
Fluoride, even in small quantities, are accumulated in the human body, the same fluoride that toothpaste and oral mouth wash manufacturers provide a warning to seek immediate medical attention should a larger than normal usage be accidentally ingested.
John P. Holdren: Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy
White House science czar John Holdren has called for the U.S. to surrender sovereignty to a “planetary regime” armed with military power to enforce population limits upon nations and prevent perceived dangers from global eco-disasters.
John P. Holdren, who infamously co-wrote a 1977 textbook in which he advocated the formation of a “planetary regime” that would use a “global police force” to enforce totalitarian measures of population control, including forced abortions, mass sterilization programs conducted via the food and water supply, as well as mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children, is a Malthusian fanatic in the tradition of the arcane anti-human ideology that originated amongst British aristocracy in the 19th century.
In the following video, disturbing truths are exposed on the ideologies that are deeply embedded in the core of Holdren’s cranium. For further evidence, here is the link to order Holdren’s book – see for yourself.
Holdren clearly specifies the planetary regime would be charged with global population control. Holdren wrote: “The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime should have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”
One customer review says: “Evil! Evil! Evil!”. Another customer said: “The tyrannical fantasies of a madman? Or merely the opinions of the person now in control of science policy in the United States? Or both?”. Either way, this is the man hand-picked by president Barack Obama.
- Satan is also called the “prince of the power of the air” in Ephesians 2:2. He is the “ruler of this world” in John 12:31. These titles and many more signify Satan’s capabilities. To say, for example, that Satan is the “prince of the power of the air” is to signify that in some way he rules over the world and the people in it.